Free resource · Word + Excel kit
AI Shopping Kit: 24 prompts to progress through 4 levels
The best everyday use cases for purchasing, from defining requirements to supplier follow-up, with ready-to-copy prompts and seven Excel tools. A step-by-step, self-directed learning path using tools your organization has already validated.
The AI Purchasing Kit, in brief
- What it is
- A self-sufficient skills development kit for purchasing teams: 24 everyday use cases, each with its prompt, organized into four levels of mastery, and a binder of seven tools.
- For who
- Buyers, project buyers and category managers, procurement officers, sourcing teams, purchasing departments of large private or public organizations, and purchasing managers who want to lead it as a team.
- Format
- 74-page Word document: user guide, fundamentals, usage framework, 24 fact sheets, 4 progress challenges, 4 current affairs files, a section for facilitating the kit in teams, 5 appendices. 7-tab Excel workbook.
- What it contains
- Copy prompts and follow-up prompts, instructions from six assistants (Projects, Gems, Copilot agents), missions of six agents and their safeguards, checkpoints, realistic gains, the three fires for prices, offers and negotiation strategies, weighted comparison grid, negotiation plan, supplier risk register, contractual deadlines.
- Tools
- Copilot Chat and Microsoft 365 Copilot (often called "Copilot Premium"), ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Mistral, in their enterprise versions, or your organization's internal assistant.
- What is it based on?
- The 2025 and 2026 Gartner, The Hackett Group and Deloitte surveys on procurement, European texts on due diligence, the AI Act, CNIL recommendations, publishers' prompting guides, and AI training sessions conducted with procurement teams from large organizations.
- Price
- Free, in exchange for a professional email address. No unsolicited emails.
- Update
- Version 1 of October 31, 2026.
- What it doesn't replace
- Your organization's purchasing rules and security policy, the advice of your lawyers, or the practice supported on your own cases.
- Go Further
- AI training for purchasing teams, Security and data kit, AI charter template.
Purchasing teams have often had access to Copilot or ChatGPT for months. They use them to rewrite emails, rarely to compare offers, prepare for negotiations, or monitor the risks of a panel. This isn't due to a lack of effort: no one has told them where to start, what information they can share with the tool regarding pricing and offers, or how to track their progress.
This page presents what recent studies say about AI in procurement, the four-level progression we use in training, the 24 selected use cases, and a sample worksheet. The complete kit, in Word format with its accompanying Excel workbook, can be downloaded for free at the bottom of the page.
1. AI in purchasing: what the 2026 figures show
According to a Gartner survey conducted in January and February 2026 among 101 procurement directors, and published on May 19, 2026, only 36% of them expressed high confidence in their ability to rethink the roles and processes of their function around AI. Gartner observes that the individual gains achieved with generative AI diminish when measured at the team level: without a shared methodology, they remain individual.
The Hackett Group's 2026 study on procurement priorities points in the same direction: 43% of organizations are actively deploying AI in procurement, almost twice as many as a year earlier, but only 12% report large-scale deployment. Procurement workloads are expected to increase by 8% in 2026, while staffing levels and budgets are shrinking.
Three consequences for a purchasing team: learn on its own cases rather than on generic examples; move forward in small steps, one situation at a time; and set a clear framework from the outset, because prices, offers and negotiation strategies are among the most sensitive data in the company.
2. Four levels, saving time by delegating
Online libraries of quick-buy strategies are almost all lists, organized by process step, without any progression order. They're used for browsing, rarely for making progress. This kit organizes use cases into four levels, each with its own learning objectives and a challenge to verify that the step has been completed.
| Level | What you do | What you learn | Example of a record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Save time | Short prompts, without sensitive data, a result in five minutes. | Formulate a request in four parts, impose a format, identify an invention. | Summarize an offer on one page |
| 2. Structure | Complete prompts, on your documents: requests, offers, reports. | Compare using constant criteria, separate fact from hypothesis, have them write "unknown". | Compare offers using constant criteria (weighted grid) |
| 3. Customize and improve reliability | Permanent assistants: Project, Gem, Copilot agent, with your rules and standard clauses. | Set the context once and for all, and give the AI your purchasing rules. | Purchase Request Qualification Assistant |
| 4. Delegate | Planned agents and missions Cowork, with safeguards and review. | Assign recurring tasks, define what the agent never does, review outputs. | Monitoring contractual deadlines and supplier risks |
Level 3 is the one most teams skip, going directly from ad-hoc use to agents. Yet it's this level that makes AI reliable: an assistant who knows your general terms and conditions of purchase and your standard clauses doesn't invent them, and an assistant who understands your rules doesn't rate an offer based on a criterion that isn't in the grid.
3. The 24 use cases, family by family
Each row represents a family of situations, each column a level. You progress through the columns; you select from the rows, depending on the week's topic. Each level covers the entire profession: no need to wait until the end of the kit to tackle the real issues.
The details of each case follow: the situation, the realistic payoff, the point to check before using the result, and what you obtain. The complete prompt, or the assistant's instructions and the agent's mission, is in the kit.
Win time
Rephrasing a vague purchase request
- A client sends you three lines: "We need a training provider for our teams, quickly." No volume, no date, no budget, no criteria. You know it will take several exchanges to understand the real need. You want to save time and send back a reformulated message and the right questions in the first reply.
- Gain: Approximately 10 to 15 minutes per vague request, and often one less email exchange.
- To be verified: The reformulation does not add any information that the prescriber has not given.
Deliverable: A clear reformulation of the need in five lines and a list of priority questions to send back to the prescriber, ranked by importance.
Questions to ask in an unfamiliar supplier market
- You're assigned a category you're unfamiliar with: generator rental, legal translation, security services, and design software licenses. Before looking for suppliers, you want to understand how this market works and avoid looking like a novice to the sales team.
- Gain: 30 minutes to 1 hour of preparation on a new category.
- Please check: The questions are relevant to your category and country.
Deliverable: A grid of questions to understand the market (structure, typical players, price formation, risks), to be used for your research and initial discussions.
Prepare questions for the candidates
- You're launching a consultation and want to include a questionnaire for candidates, or prepare a presentation meeting. You know that poorly worded questions produce answers that are impossible to compare. You want precise questions, open-ended where useful and closed-ended where you need to compare.
- Savings: 20 to 40 minutes on questionnaire preparation.
- To check: Each question relates to a criterion that you will actually evaluate.
Deliverable: A questionnaire structured by theme, with the type of answer expected for each question, ready to be adapted to your case.
Summarize an offer on one page
- You receive a 30-page business proposal, full of corporate jargon and few concrete commitments. You want to extract the essentials in a few minutes to determine if it meets your needs and prepare your questions. This is a spontaneous offer or a proposal submitted outside of a formal procedure, which your policy allows to be processed in the approved tool.
- Savings: 20 to 40 minutes on an offer of 20 to 40 pages.
- To be verified: The quantified commitments correspond exactly to the document (cited page).
Deliverable: A one-page summary: what is proposed, what is committed to, what is unclear, questions to ask.
Responding to a supplier's argument
- A supplier tells you: "Our raw material costs have increased; we have to implement an 8% price hike on January 1st." Or: "This price is our best price; it's the rate we offer our biggest customers." You want to prepare a well-reasoned response without getting into an unnecessary power struggle.
- Gain: 15 to 30 minutes of preparation before a call or written response.
- Please check: The answers are compatible with your contract (revision clause, notice period).
Deliverable: Three to five possible responses to the argument, from the most collaborative to the most firm, with questions that require the supplier to justify their position.
Supplier follow-up or complaint email
- A delivery is late for the second time, an invoice doesn't match the order, or a deliverable is substandard. You need to write the supplier a clear, factual message that gets a quick response without damaging the relationship. You write several of these messages per week.
- Savings: 5 to 10 minutes per email, more for sensitive claims.
- To be verified: The dates, references and facts are correct.
Deliverable: A factual, ready-to-review and send email with a precise request and deadline.
Structure
Drafting the specifications with the client
- The need is now defined, and you must produce a specifications document (or a technical specifications document) with the client. Usually, you start with an existing document, adapt it, and the client revises it several times. You want a structured first draft that clearly distinguishes requirements, wishes, and points to be decided, to be reviewed together in a meeting.
- Savings: 2 to 4 hours on a first draft of specifications, depending on its complexity.
- To be verified: Each requirement marked [hypothesis] has been validated or removed with the prescriber.
Deliverable: A structured draft specification, with numbered and classified requirements (mandatory, desirable), and a list of points that the specifier must arbitrate.
Sourced Supplier Prequalification Form
- You've identified several potential suppliers and need to decide which ones to consult. Before meeting with them, you want a profile for each supplier, compiled from publicly available information (website, annual report, publications, registers), including the source of each piece of information. Your tool includes a web search function.
- Savings: 30 to 45 minutes per supplier, compared to a manual search.
- To check: At least open the links to the information that matters for your decision (size, certifications, risk signals).
Deliverable: A prequalification sheet per supplier, where each piece of information is sourced by a link, and where points not found are marked "unknown".
Consultation file and response grid, including CSR
- The specifications have been approved. You now need to compile the tender documents: the tender letter or regulations, criteria and weighting, the required response framework for candidates, and the CSR component. You want a response framework that makes the offers comparable, and CSR criteria that are proportionate to the purchase and verifiable.
- Savings: Half a day to a full day on assembling a complete file.
- Please note: The weightings total 100% and correspond to the decision of your committee or your hierarchy.
Deliverable: A draft consultation letter, a weighted criteria grid and the response framework imposed on candidates, with a CSR component adapted to the category.
Compare offers using constant criteria (weighted grid)
- You have received four proposals. Each is structured differently, with its own assumptions, options, and exclusions. You must prepare the analysis according to the framework defined in the consultation document. The AI should save you time on data extraction and comparison, but it must not, under any circumstances, designate a winner.
- Profit: Half a day to a full day analyzing four offers of about twenty pages each, excluding verification.
- To verify: Each extracted element links to a page that you have checked, at least for the most weighted criteria.
Deliverable: A table comparing the offers, criterion by criterion, with extracted elements from each offer, the reference page, missing elements, and clarifying questions. Any requested scores are suggestions for revision, justified by the rubric.
Objectives, scenarios and concession plan
- You're preparing for an important negotiation: a renewal, a requested price increase, or the final award after consultation. You know what you want, but you want comprehensive preparation: objectives, alternatives, the supplier's scenarios, possible concessions, and their order. You want AI to force you to explicitly state what you often leave implicit.
- Gain: 1 to 2 hours of preparation on a high-stakes negotiation.
- To be verified: Assumptions about the supplier are identified as such, not presented as facts.
Deliverable: A structured negotiation plan: objectives by topic, best alternative, likely scenarios for the supplier, ordered concessions plan and key questions.
Supplier performance review (KPIs, incidents)
- You are preparing for the quarterly or annual review with a strategic supplier. You have an export of key performance indicators (service levels, lead times, non-conformities), the incident log, and reports from previous reviews. You want factual review materials that distinguish trends from isolated cases and a proposed action plan.
- Savings: 1 to 3 hours on preparing a performance review.
- To verify: Recalculate at least two indicators yourself to check the method.
Deliverable: A quantified and sourced performance summary, incident analysis, previous commitments met or not, and a draft agenda and action plan.
Customize and make reliable
Purchase Request Qualification Assistant
- Your team receives dozens of purchase requests of widely varying quality every week. Each buyer asks the same questions, but in their own way. You want an assistant that any buyer, or even the specifiers themselves, can use to categorize a request according to a common framework and direct it to the correct purchasing channel.
- Savings: 10 to 20 minutes per request, and consistent records from one buyer to another.
- To verify: Test the assistant on five past requests where you know the correct workflow.
Deliverable: An assistant that transforms any request into a standard qualification sheet, indicates what is missing, proposes the applicable purchasing circuit according to your thresholds and prepares questions for the prescriber.
Category Sourcing Assistant
- You are responsible for a category (for example, IT services, energy, or packaging). You compile market reports, supplier profiles, trade show reports, and analyses. You want an assistant who understands your category strategy and can help you with every new sourcing question, drawing on your documentation and cited online sources.
- Gain: 1 to 2 hours per complex sourcing question, and category memory that no longer depends on a single person.
- To be verified: The proposed suppliers exist and correspond to the indicated activity (open the links).
Deliverable: An "expert in your category" assistant that responds by distinguishing what your documentation says, what the web says (with links) and what remains unknown.
Consulting assistant for company rules (general terms and conditions, standard clauses)
- Each buyer prepares their documentation in their own way, and the general terms and conditions of purchase (GTC), standard clauses, and templates are not always correctly reproduced. Legal professionals often review the same errors. You want an assistant who understands your company's procedures and produces compliant documentation the first time.
- Savings: 1 to 3 hours per case, and fewer back-and-forths with the legal department.
- To verify: Have the assistant validated by the legal department on two real cases before distributing it.
Deliverable: An assistant who drafts or checks the documents for a consultation by applying your templates, your general terms and conditions and your library of clauses, and who reports any deviations.
Discrepancies and reserves assistant
- In bids, the real risks are often hidden in the disclaimers, assumptions, exclusions, and special conditions. Identifying them requires a careful, line-by-line reading of each bid. You want a specialist assistant who consistently performs this reading in the same way, bid after bid, based on your specifications.
- Savings: 1 to 2 hours per complex offer, with an identical method from one offer to another.
- To verify: Check the citations and pages on a sample, prioritizing high-impact reserves.
Deliverable: For each offer, a comprehensive list of deviations from the specifications, reservations, exclusions and assumptions, including page numbers and clarifying questions. Offers will never be ranked.
Simulation with a salesperson played by AI
- You have a difficult negotiation in two days. You've prepared your plan (sheet 2.5), but you want to practice with a realistic counterpart who resists, uses classic sales techniques, and doesn't give in easily. You also want feedback on your performance.
- Benefit: Difficult to quantify in terms of time; the key is the quality of preparation. A 20-minute simulation replaces training sessions that are rarely done due to a lack of partners.
- To verify: The debriefing is based on what you actually said during the simulation.
Deliverable: A training partner who plays a demanding salesperson, reacts to your proposals, and then gives you a structured debrief of the simulation.
Analysis of an export of expenses (spend)
- You've extracted the year's expenses from your ERP system: thousands of lines, inconsistent descriptions, duplicate suppliers under multiple names, and poorly defined categories. You want an initial spend analysis: who, what, how much, what concentration, and what avenues to explore, without waiting for a business intelligence project.
- Gain: Half a day to two days on an initial analysis of expenses, depending on the size and quality of the export.
- Please check: The total amount calculated is identical to that of your ERP extract.
Deliverable: An assistant who cleans and classifies the export, calculates the distribution by supplier and by category, identifies concentration, off-contract expenses and potential savings, showing their calculations.
Delegate
Incoming Request Sorting Agent
- The purchasing department's shared inbox receives requests, questions, follow-ups, and quotes from stakeholders every day. Sorting through these inboxes in the morning takes time, and some urgent requests are pending. You need an agent who reads the new messages, categorizes them, prepares the qualification form, and proposes an assignment, without ever responding on behalf of the team.
- Savings: 30 minutes to 1 hour per day on sorting a loaded shared box, once the agent is reliable.
- To check: During the first two weeks, compare the agent's sorting with a manual sorting.
Deliverable: Each morning, a table sorting the requests received the previous day: type, category, urgency, circuit, proposed buyer, missing elements, with a draft response to the prescriber when useful.
Market monitoring and suppliers
- For your strategic categories, you need to monitor commodity price and index trends, new entrants, supplier difficulties, and regulatory changes. You don't have time to do this monitoring every week, and you often discover the information too late.
- Gain: 1 to 3 hours of monitoring per week and per category.
- To verify: Open the links of the "confirmed" facts before citing them internally.
Deliverable: A weekly monitoring note by category, sourced, which distinguishes facts from weak signals and proposes actions to study.
End-to-end consulting on assignment Cowork
- You are launching a medium-complexity consultation and want to delegate the complete preparation of the file: review of the validated specifications, drafting of documents according to your templates, analysis grid, response framework, candidate mailing list, and reverse timeline. A mission Cowork can work on your files for an hour and deliver a file ready to review.
- Savings: Half a day to a day and a half on assembling a file, once the models are in place.
- To check: Review the "Control" file first, then each part.
Deliverable: A complete consultation file in a working folder, with a control file that lists what has been done, the sources used and the points to be validated.
Counting and reporting to the commitment committee
- The bids have arrived, the tender criteria are finalized, and you must present a summary report to the commitment committee (or commission): context, procedure followed, bids received, criterion-by-criterion analysis, and key points to consider. Compiling this report takes a day. You would like a team to prepare it based on your analyses, which you will have validated.
- Gain: Half a day to a full day spent drafting a note to the committee.
- To check: The weighted totals are correct (recalculate at least one total by hand).
Deliverable: A draft report for the committee, structured according to your template, which accurately reflects your validated analyses, along with a traceability file. The award proposal remains the responsibility of the buyer.
Negotiation debriefing based on the minutes
- The negotiation dragged on for several weeks: meetings, calls, emails, and successive drafts of offers. Now it's time to take stock: what was achieved, what was conceded, what remains open, and what the team can learn for next time. You want a team to reconstruct the history and write the debriefing.
- Gain: 1 to 3 hours on the reconstruction and writing of a debriefing.
- To be verified: The final positions correspond to the latest written version of the offer.
Deliverable: A chronology of the negotiation, a table of initial, intermediate and final positions by subject, a summary of concessions and lessons learned, ready to be reviewed and archived.
Monitoring contractual deadlines and supplier risks
- Your portfolio includes dozens of contracts: end dates, notice periods for termination, automatic renewals, annual price reviews, certificates to be renewed, and scheduled performance reviews. Missing a deadline can result in an unwanted year-long renewal. You want an agent who monitors these deadlines and cross-references supplier risk signals.
- Gain: 2 to 4 hours per month on portfolio monitoring, and above all fewer missed deadlines.
- To verify: Check the notice period deadlines on a sample of contracts, by rereading the clause in the contract itself.
Deliverable: Each month, a table of deadlines for the next 90 days with the action to be taken, and an immediate alert when a notice period is approaching or a risk signal concerns an active supplier.
4. An example of a summary sheet: summarizing an offer in one page
All the worksheets follow the same structure: the situation, what you get, the prompt to copy, a follow-up prompt, the checkpoints, the realistic gain, and the safeguard. Here is the prompt for worksheet 1.4, to be pasted as is into your assistant, replacing the highlighted sections.
You are an experienced buyer. Here is a business proposal (attached file).
Summarize it in a maximum of one page, using 5 sections:
1. What is being proposed (scope, deliverables)
2. Quantified or dated commitments (deadlines, service levels, guarantees), citing the page
3. The conditions (duration, price revision, termination, penalties) as written
4. That which is vague or absent
5. The 5 questions to ask the supplier
Rules: Only use what is written in the document; if information is missing, write "unknown" instead of guessing. Do not evaluate the offer or give an opinion on the supplier.
Before using the result: the quantified commitments correspond exactly to the document (cited page); the "vague or absent" section does not omit any important point for you; the summary does not contain any judgment that you did not request.
5. The three non-negotiable rules
AI compares, it never chooses. It extracts, compares, and highlights discrepancies according to criteria established before the bids are opened. The award decision remains human, reasoned, and documented. In public procurement, equal treatment of candidates is mandatory.
Prices, offers, and strategies remain in the validated tool. Candidate offers, price ceilings, fallback positions, and negotiation strategies are never included in a consumer-grade tool. The kit categorizes them as "red flags" and specifies which tools are suitable for which information.
Check before committing. Every figure, every clause, every piece of information about a supplier generated by AI is verified at the source before being entered into a file, a committee, or a message. Each sheet in the kit concludes with the points to be verified.
6. What the kit contains
Version 1, published on October 31, 2026. The kit is a 74-page Word document. It opens with a user guide (the matrix of 24 fact sheets, the recommended pace of one hour per week, and where to begin), 2026 figures, the fundamentals (the four-building block method, requiring sources, verification, and the equivalent functions of Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Mistral), and the usage framework (the three-pronged approach to purchasing data, public procurement, GDPR for supplier contacts, and Article 4 of the AI Act). Next come the four levels, each with its own introduction, six fact sheets, and a completion challenge. Four topical dossiers for 2026-2027 address the European duty of vigilance following the omnibus bill, the "AI discount" under negotiation, autonomous purchasing agents, and confidentiality in the tools. One section is aimed at the purchasing manager who wants to facilitate the toolkit as a team, and five appendices complete the package. The Excel workbook includes seven tools: self-assessment, a library of 24 prompts, a weighted comparison grid for offers, a negotiation plan, a supplier risk register, contractual deadlines, and a time-save measurement tool.
Download the AI Procurement Kit (Word and Excel, free)
74 pages, 24 fact sheets across 4 levels, 4 progress challenges, 4 current affairs dossiers, and a binder of 7 tools. Written by NextStart.AI based on surveys by Gartner, The Hackett Group, and Deloitte, European regulations, CNIL recommendations, and AI training sessions conducted with purchasing teams from large organizations.
- Fundamentals of prompt purchasing and a three-pronged usage framework
- 24 fact sheets: needs assessment, sourcing, consultation, offers, negotiation, follow-up
- Six assistants and six agents ready to configure, with their safeguards.
- Weighted grid, negotiation plan, risks and deadlines in Excel
7. Frequently Asked Questions
Do we already need to use AI to operate the kit?
No. The self-placement grid indicates where to start, and level 1 begins with short prompts, without sensitive data. A buyer who is already comfortable starts at level 2 or 3, after completing the challenge of passing the previous level to verify their understanding.
Can AI choose the supplier?
No. The toolkit uses it to extract, compare, and flag discrepancies according to criteria defined before the bids are opened. The award decision remains made, justified, and tracked by authorized personnel.
Can offers or prices be pasted into the tool?
Only in the tool validated by your organization for this purpose, in its enterprise version, and in compliance with your charter. In any other tool, data must be anonymized or omitted. The framework of the toolkit categorizes purchasing data into three categories.
What tools does the kit work with?
Copilot Chat and Microsoft 365 Copilot (often called "Copilot Premium"), ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Mistral, in their enterprise versions, or your organization's internal assistant. The prompts are copied as is; the level 3 and 4 guides describe the specific setup for each tool.
Is the kit suitable for public buyers?
Yes. The framework for use recalls the principles of public procurement (equal treatment of candidates, confidentiality of offers, traceability of the analysis), and the consultation and offer analysis forms respect them.
Can the kit be distributed to the entire purchasing team?
Yes, freely within your organization, in its original form; the prompts and the binder can be adapted without restriction.
8. Going further
The kit is sufficient on its own for a motivated buyer. It goes faster, and further, when the team uses it together on their own cases: that's the purpose of the AI training for purchasing teams from NextStart.AI, in 1.5 hours or half a day, prepared with your purchasing contact and delivered using tools approved by your organization. To define the uses of sensitive data, the Security and data kit extends the chapter on the framework.
The entire series of free kits. To drive adoption: AI charter template, AI training plan template, AI Ambassadors Kit, Manager's toolkit for dealing with AI, AI-powered time-saving kit, Adoption Roadmap Kit, AI maturity grid, AI Measurement and ROI Kit, AI Governance Kit, Cowork kit, 50 Copilot M365 prompts, Copilot Studio kit, Deploy Microsoft 365 Copilot kit, Copilot Kit Cat, Copilot Excel kit, Copilot Teams and Outlook kit, Copilot Word and PowerPoint kit, Configure Claude kit, Deploying Claude in the Workplace Kit, Claude Agents Kit, Claude Skills kit, Claude Plugins Kit, Claude Code kit, Claude Design kit et Vibe coding kitFor the AI project sponsor: AI Act kit, GDPR kit, Security and data kit, Shadow AI kit, AI and Social Dialogue Kit, frugal AI kit, AI Sovereignty Kit et responsible AI kitBy profession: AI HR kit, AI marketing kit, AI finance kit, AI kit for lawyers, AI kit for salespeople, AI toolkit for project managers, AI innovator kit, communicator's AI kit, AI Shopping Kit et AI Kit for Researchers.
9. sources
The figures and references cited on this page and in the kit are based on the following sources, verified on October 31, 2026.
- Gartner, Gartner Survey Shows Just 36% of Chief Procurement Officers Are Very Confident in Ability to Redesign Function for AI, May 19, 2026
- The Hackett Group, The Hackett Group Reports Rapid Progress in Procurement's AI Agenda (2026 Procurement Key Issues), March 17, 2026.
- Deloitte, 2025 Global Chief Procurement Officer Survey, 2025.
- Origami Marketplace (summary of the AgileBuyer and CNA study), CNA and AgileBuyer study: four key points to remember for procurement in 2026January 2026, updated February 2026.
- Latham & Watkins, EU Sustainability Omnibus Published in the Official Journal, 2026.
- Arthur Cox, Omnibus I Directive published: revised scope and reduced obligations under CSRD and CSDDD, 2026.
- Stibbe, Omnibus I: clarity on the future of the CSRD and CSDDD, 2026.
- Latham & Watkins, European Commission opens consultation on future CSDDD guidelines, June 2026.
- Hunton Andrews Kurth, EU Digital Omnibus on AI enters into force (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744), July 2026.
- KI-Campus, EU AI Act: AI Omnibus recalibrates Article 4, AI literacy remains mandatory, July 28, 2026.
- CNIL, How to deploy generative AI: the CNIL provides initial clarifications, July 18, 2024.
- Légifrance, presented by code-commande-publique.com, Public Procurement Code, Article L3 (Principles of Public Procurement), in force.
- Légifrance, presented by code-commande-publique.com, Public procurement code, article L2132-1 (confidentiality of information), in force.
- Microsoft, Enterprise data protection in Microsoft 365 Copilot and Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, 2026.
- HFS Research, AI drives IT contract renegotiations within 24 months as pricing models shift, June 30, 2026.
- Incisiv, Coupa Goes All-In on Agentic: Key Takeaways from Inspire 2026, May 2026.
- SAPinsider, SAP delivers Joule agents across Ariba and Fieldglass in June 2026, June 25, 2026.
- CPO Rising Inside Ivalua NOW 2026: Procurement Enters the Agentic AI Era, April 22, 2026.
- Anthropic, Prompt engineering overview, online.
- Google Gemini for Google Workspace Prompting Guide 101, 2024.